E-Miracle: An inquiry-realistic digital module to support students’ 6C competencies
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
The increasing demand for twenty-first-century competencies requires mathematics learning environments that not only support conceptual understanding but also foster students' broader competencies, such as critical thinking, creativity, communication, collaboration, character, and citizenship (6C). However, classroom practices in geometry often emphasize procedural knowledge, limiting students' opportunities to construct mathematical meaning through exploration and contextual reasoning. This study aimed to develop an inquiry–realistic digital module, namely E-Miracle, using Scratch to support the development of students' 6C competencies in learning about quadrilaterals. The study employed an educational design research approach consisting of three iterative phases: preliminary design, teaching experiment, and retrospective analysis. During the preliminary phase, the structure of the digital module and the learning trajectory were designed by integrating inquiry-based learning principles with contextual problems inspired by Realistic Mathematics Education. The prototype was subsequently refined through expert validation and small-scale implementation. The results indicate that the developed module achieved high validity according to expert judgment. Furthermore, the module's practicality was demonstrated through classroom implementation, where both teachers and students used it effectively during learning activities. Students actively engaged in collaborative exploration and contextual problem solving through Scratch-assisted tasks. The findings suggest that the E-Miracle module provides a learning environment that supports the development of students' 6C competencies, particularly in collaborative exploration, the communication of ideas, and creative problem-solving. These results imply that integrating inquiry-based learning, realistic mathematical contexts, and digital technology can provide meaningful learning experiences that foster deeper mathematical understanding.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author is responsible for acquiring the permission(s) to reproduce any copyrighted figures, tables, data, or text that are being used in the submitted paper. Authors should note that text quotations of more than 250 words from a published or copyrighted work will require grant of permission from the original publisher to reprint. The written permission letter(s) must be submitted together with the manuscript.References
Alnasyan, B., Basheri, M., & Alassafi, M. (2024). The power of deep learning techniques for predicting student performance in virtual learning environments: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100231
Anggraeni, P., Puspita, R. D., Sopandi, W., Maftuh, B., & Sunendar, D. (2022). Why 6 cs? The urgency of learning at elementary school. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Educational Development and Quality Assurance (ICED-QA 2021), (Vol. 650, pp. 35–41). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220303.008
Ayuningtyas, W., Mardiyana, M., & Pramudya, I. (2019). Analysis of student’s geometry reasoning ability at senior high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188(1), 012016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012016
Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Prospects and challenges for inquiry-based approaches to learning. In H. Dumont, D. Istance, & F. Benavides (Eds.), The nature of learning: Using research to inspire practice (pp. 199–226). OECD.
Ceballos, H., Bogaart, T. v. d., van Ginkel, S., Spandaw, J., & Drijvers, P. (2026). How collaborative problem solving promotes higher-order thinking skills: A systematic review of design features and processes. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 59, 102001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102001
Fan, J.-Y., & Ye, J.-H. (2022). The effectiveness of inquiry and practice during project design courses at a technology university. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 859164. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.859164
Fauzan, A., Harisman, Y., Yerizon, Y., Suherman, S., Tasman, F., Nisa, S., Sumarwati, S., Hafizatunnisa, H., & Syaputra, H. (2024). Realistic mathematics education (RME) to improve literacy and numeracy skills of elementary school students based on teachers’ experience. Infinity Journal, 13(2), 301–316. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v13i2.p301-316
Gravemeijer, K., & Cobb, P. (2006). Design research from a learning design perspective. In J. Van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 29–63). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203088364-12
Hakim, A. R., Asikin, M., & Nurcahyono, A. (2021). The development of learning module with mobile augmented reality based on 9E learning cycle to improve problem solving skills. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 10(1), 1–9.
Hidayat, W., & Aripin, U. (2023). How to develop an E-LKPD with a scientific approach to achieving students' mathematical communication abilities? Infinity Journal, 12(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v12i1.p85-100
Hidayat, W., Aripin, U., & Widodo, S. A. (2025). Integration of ethno-modelling and 3N: An innovative digital worksheet framework to enhance students' mathematical critical thinking skills. Infinity Journal, 14(4), 1019–1042. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v14i4.p1019-1042
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368
Irawan, E., Kusumah, Y. S., & Saputri, V. (2023). Pengembangan multimedia interaktif menggunakan Scratch: Solusi pembelajaran di era society 5.0 [Interactive multimedia development using Scratch: Learning solutions in the era of society 5.0]. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v12i1.6226
Irdalisa, I., Paidi, P., & Djukri, D. (2020). Implementation of technology-based guided inquiry to improve TPACK among prospective biology teachers. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1323a
Iskrenovic-Momcilovic, O. (2020). Improving geometry teaching with Scratch. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(2), em0582. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/7807
Johar, R., Annisa, D., Mailizar, M., Zubainur, C. M., Zubaidah, T., Usman, U., Indriyani, L., & Musa, M. (2025). Development of algebraic expressions e-modules through realistic mathematics education approach. Infinity Journal, 14(4), 973–994. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v14i4.p973-994
Kembara, M. D., Rozak, R. W. A., Maftuh, B., & Hadian, V. A. (2022). Research based learning to improve students 6C skills during the pandemic. In Proceedings of the 4th Social and Humanities Research Symposium (SoRes 2021), (pp. 107–111). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220407.020
Kokeb, A., Atnafu, M., & Mohammed, A. (2025). The effects of visually assisted guided discovery learning strategy on tenth grade students' problem solving skill of plane geometry. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 17(2), 193–225.
Kumazah, V., & Agyei, D. D. (2025). Uncovering the power of inquiry-based teaching; Enhancing geometric thinking skills in students. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR), 7(1), 1–18.
Larsen, S., & Lockwood, E. (2013). A local instructional theory for the guided reinvention of the quotient group concept. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(4), 726–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.02.010
Latorre-Cosculluela, C., Suárez, C., Quiroga, S., Sobradiel-Sierra, N., Lozano-Blasco, R., & Rodríguez-Martínez, A. (2021). Flipped classroom model before and during COVID-19: using technology to develop 21st century skills. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(2), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1108/itse-08-2020-0137
Listiawati, N., Sabon, S. S., Siswantari, S., Subijanto, S., Wibowo, S., Zulkardi, Z., & Riyanto, B. (2023). Analysis of implementing Realistic Mathematics Education principles to enhance mathematics competence of slow learner students. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(4), 683–700. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i4.pp683-700
Mulenga, E. M., Folokwe, K., & Hamankolo, M. (2025). Exploring indigenous teaching approaches for geometry instruction in three secondary schools within Zambia. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 17(1), 153–192.
Palinussa, A. L., Tupamahu, P. Z., Sabandar, V. P., Makaruku, Y. H., & Sabandar, J. (2025). Realistic mathematics education: Mathematics e-modules in improving student learning outcomes. Infinity Journal, 14(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v14i1.p45-64
Prananta, Y. R. (2021). Pengembangan model pembelajaran abad 21 berbasis media penanaman karakter bertema nilai-nilai Pancasila dan sadar konstitusi [Development of a 21st century learning model based on character building media with the theme of Pancasila values and constitutional awareness.]. Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar, 5(2), 375–398. https://doi.org/10.26811/didaktika.v5i2.213
Pratiwi, M. D., Putri, R. I. I., & Zulkardi, Z. (2022). Mathematics critical thinking ability materials social arrithmatic class VII assisted video animation in the era of COVID-19. Infinity Journal, 11(2), 297–310. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v11i2.p297-310
Prayogi, R. D., & Estetika, R. (2019). Kecakapan abad 21: Kompetensi digital pendidik masa depan [21st century skills: Digital competencies of future educators]. Manajemen Pendidikan, 14(2), 144–151. https://doi.org/10.23917/jmp.v14i2.9486
Purnomo, Y. W., Nabillah, R., Aziz, T. A., & Widodo, S. A. (2024). Fostering mathematical connections and habits of mind: A problem-based learning module for elementary education. Infinity Journal, 13(2), 333–348. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v13i2.p333-348
Rosidin, U., Widyastuti, W., Kadaritna, N., & Handoko, H. (2024). The implementation of dynamic society oriented 6c skills assessment instruments in case method and team based project learning. JISAE: Journal of Indonesian Student Assessment and Evaluation, 10(1), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.21009/jisae.v10i1.43879
Sahrudin, A., Pamungkas, A. S., Pagiling, S. L., & Rosdianwinata, E. (2025). Integration of abstraction theory and TPACK framework in geometry learning to optimize prospective mathematics teachers’ spatial abilities. Infinity Journal, 14(4), 899–918. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v14i4.p899-918
Saryadi, W., & Sulisworo, D. (2023). Development of e-module based on the discovery learning to improve the student creative thinking skills. JTAM (Jurnal Teori Dan Aplikasi Matematika), 7(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v7i1.10185
Stevani, A. L., Tanujaya, B., & Widodo, S. A. (2025). Android-based mathematics learning media on geometry using the context of tourist destinations. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 17(2), 60–79.
Suharta, I. G. P., Suparta, I. N., & Setiawan, K. A. (2025). Development of a 2D shape e-module based on project-based learning with Scratch to improve computational thinking skills. International Journal of Education, Management, and Technology, 3(1), 242–262. https://doi.org/10.58578/ijemt.v3i1.4918
Sutarni, S., Sutama, S., Prayitno, H. J., Sutopo, A., & Laksmiwati, P. A. (2024). The development of realistic mathematics education-based student worksheets to enhance higher-order thinking skills and mathematical ability. Infinity Journal, 13(2), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v13i2.p285-300
Swidan, O., & Arzarello, F. (2022). Adaptive instruction in an inquiry-based mathematics and digitally rich classroom – multiple perspectives. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 66, 100962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2022.100962
Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J.-M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., Feybesse, C., Sundquist, D., & Lubart, T. (2023). Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: Assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st century skills for the future of work and education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054
van den Akker, J. (2013). Curricular development research as a specimen of educational design research. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research part A: An introduction (pp. 52–71). Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development (SLO).
Wijaya, T. T., Hidayat, W., Hermita, N., Alim, J. A., & Talib, C. A. (2024). Exploring contributing factors to PISA 2022 mathematics achievement: Insights from Indonesian teachers. Infinity Journal, 13(1), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v13i1.p139-156
Yumiati, Y., Putra, H. D., & Haji, S. (2024). Blended online learning: Students' perception and its effect on learning outcomes abstract algebra. Infinity Journal, 14(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v14i1.p65-84
Zafrullah, Z., Arriza, L., Rashid, S., Mwakapemba, J. L., Santos, M. D., & Rasheed, U. (2025). Research trends on deep learning for mathematics learning in scopus database: Concept map & emerging themes using scopus AI. Elementaria: Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.61166/elm.v3i1.93
Zhengtao, Z., & Hidayat, R. (2025). The effects of augmented reality (AR) toward achievement on the graphs and geometry topic among third-grade students. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 17(1), 82–98.